Wednesday, July 30, 2008

UbD for all?

Reading UbD I've been wondering about the appropriateness of a design plan for all grades and content areas.  I'm not saying that I don't think that one design format can work, but I do wonder if each content area is as readily adaptable to the UbD template.

Maybe I'm just having my doubts because I'm finding Wiggins and McTigue's literature-based examples so difficult to buy into. When they discuss the dangers of students reading Catcher in the Rye as an adolescent adventure story I thought, "Are you kidding me?!?!" Even the most limited readers I've ever encountered have been able to tell that Holden is "messed up". When they suggested that reading Macbeth as a play about loyalty would be great I thought, "Is that it? There is sooooo much more!" If we're talking about BIG questions, essential questions, shouldn't the examples speak to the BIG ideas? Then, when they were offering an example of irony and they completely misdefined it (Who consulted on this - Alanis Morrisett?) I completely lost it.  How am I to envision using these ideas when they can't offer salient examples of understandings and questions in my content area? Am I really supposed to think that this will work if the creators of this program can't even think of viable exemplars?

No comments: